10
Methods
In this study, 600 individuals and their corresponding case files
(N=605) and re-examination case files (N=287) from the Agency
have been reviewed with a focus on whether the Agency’s
information in the decision is comprehensible and relevant to the
individual. Additionally, the ISF has also analysed register data and
undertaken semi-structured interviews with the Agency.
Findings
The prerequisites for being entitled to sickness benefit are described
accurately and tailored to the individual’s situation in one out of ten
decisions. The study shows that the Agency does not fully describe
the individual circumstances justifying denial or withdrawal of
sickness benefit in one out of four decisions.
The study also shows that the probability of having one’s decision
changed fluctuates depending on which, of the three responsible, re-
examination unit that has reviewed the decision. Consequently this
may have implications for the legal rights of the individual.
Conclusions
The main conclusion of this report is that the information given to
individuals when sickness benefit is denied or withdrawn is
insufficient. The information does not give the individual the
opportunity to fully exercise their legal rights. It is also concluded
that the re-examination process cannot guarantee an accurate and
uniform application of legislation.
