Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 66 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

10

The intention of the employer co-financing scheme was to create

economic incentives for employers to prevent and counteract long-

term sick leave among their employees. The incentives were designed

so that they would encourage the prevention of sickness absences,

rehabilitation and other measures to facilitate the absentee’s return to

work, either on a full or part-time basis.

The co-financing represented 15 percent of the employee's sickness

benefits during the time the employee was on sick leave full time.

The employer did not pay the co-financing fee if the employee was

instead on partial sick leave or was granted a disability pension, or

received other forms of sickness benefits, e.g., rehabilitation benefits.

There was also a floor below which employers were exempted from

paying the co-financing fee (

fribelopp

), as well as a ceiling on the co-

financing fee. The floor meant that many small firms did not pay any

fees.

One effect of the reform could thus have been the return of

employees on sick leave to work. Another effect could have been the

replacement of full-time absences by part-time sick leave, since

employers benefited from employees being on part-time, rather than

full-time, sick leave.

However, with their increasing financial responsibility for the costs of

sickness insurance, one side-effect might have been that employers

became more selective in the hiring process in order to avoid

potential future costs. Groups of workers with high expected rates of

sick leave may thus have been disadvantaged in the labour market, as

their job opportunities may have been worsened because of the co-

financing fees. The reform may also have led employers to encourage

the separation of employees who were on long-term sick leave, with

the employees either applying for a disability pension or leaving the

workplace.

The aim of this study

While relatively much is known concerning the economic incentives

for workers regarding sickness insurance, there is little evidence

regarding the impact of firm incentives. The purpose of this analysis

is to investigate how the introduction of the employer co-financing

scheme correlates with changes in the duration of sickness leave

periods and the probabilities of transitions between full-time and part-