18 / 20
18(20)
References
Ashenfelter, O., Ashmore, D., and Deschêns, O. (2005). “Do
Unemployment Insurance Recipients Actively Seek Work? Randomised
Trials in Four U.S. States”,
Journal of Econometrics
, 125, 53–75.
Blundell R, Costa Dias, M., Meghir C and Van Reenen J. ( 2004).
“Evaluating the Employment Impact of a Mandatory Job Search Program”,
Journal of the European Economic Association
, 2, 569-606.
Boone, J. and J. van Ours (2000). “Modelling financial incentives to get the
unemployed back to work”,
IZA discussion paper
no. 108.
Cockx, B. and Dejemeppe, M. (2007). “
Is the Notification of Monitoring a
Threat to the Unemployed? A Regression Discontinuity Approach”, IZA DP
2854.
Coleman, S, (1996), “The Minnesota income tax compliance experiment –
state tax results”, Minnesota Department of Revenue.
D’Amuri, F. (2011). “Monetary incentives vs. monitoring in addressing
absenteeism: experimental evidence”,
Temi di discussione (Economic
working papers)
787.
De Jong, P., Lindeboom, M. and van der Klaauw, B. (2011). “Screening
Disability Insurance Applications”,
Journal of the European Economic
Association
, 9, 106–129.
Dolton, P. and O’Neill, D. (1996). “Unemployment Duration and the Restart
Effect: Some Experimental Evidence
”, Economic Journal
, 106, 387–400.
Engström, P., P. Hesselius and M. Persson (2007): Excess use of temporary
parental benefit. IFAU working paper 2007:18.
Hägglund, P. (2012): “Effects of Introducing Time-limits in the Sickness
Insurance System on Return to Work – Evidence from the Swedish
Rehabilitation Chain.” Empirical Economics, August 2012.
Hägglund, P. (2010). “Do Time Limits in the Sickness Insurance System
Increase Return to Work?”, Working Paper 2010:1. The Swedish Social
Insurance Inspectorate.
Hartman, L., Hesselius, P. and P. Johansson (2013): “Effects of eligibility
screening in the sickness insurance: Evidence from a field experiment.”
Labour Economics
, 20, 48–56.
Hasseldine, J, P White, S James and M Toumi (2007) “Persuasive
Communications: Tax Compliance Enforcement Strategies for Sole
Proprietors”,
Contemporary Accounting Research
, 24:1, 171-94.