AHO WORKS StudieS 2011-2012
        
        
          Institute of Urbanism and Landscape
        
        
          Legacy, Opportunity, Responsibility
        
        
          and its replacement by standardized formu-
        
        
          las legible only from the center is virtually
        
        
          inscribed in the activities of both the state
        
        
          and large-scale bureaucratic capitalism. As
        
        
          a ‘project,’ it is the object of constant initi-
        
        
          atives which are never entirely successful,
        
        
          for nor forms of production or social life can
        
        
          be made to work by formulas alone – that
        
        
          is, without metis. The logic animating the
        
        
          project, however, is one of control and ap-
        
        
          propriation. Local knowledge, because it is
        
        
          dispersed and relatively autonomous, is all
        
        
          but unappropriable. The reduction or, more
        
        
          utopian still, the elimination of metis and
        
        
          the local control it entails are preconditions,
        
        
          in the case of the state, of administrative
        
        
          order and fiscal appropriation and, in the
        
        
          case of the large capitalistic firm, of worker
        
        
          discipline and profit [Scott 1998: 335–6].
        
        
          Perhaps, metis has to be leitmotiv of the Insti-
        
        
          tute, regardless whether it occupies itself with
        
        
          urbanism or landscape.
        
        
          References
        
        
          De Meulder, B. and  Shannon, K. (2010), ‘Traditions
        
        
          of Landscape Urbanism’,
        
        
          
            Topos
          
        
        
          71 (June 2010), pp.
        
        
          62–67.
        
        
          
            The Economist
          
        
        
          (2012), ‘The Vanishing North: What
        
        
          the Melting of the Arctic Means for Trade, Energy and
        
        
          the Environment’, Special Report, 16–22 June 2012.
        
        
          Severin, C. (2012), ‘Norway to Double Carbon Tax on
        
        
          Oil Industry: Extra Funding for Climate Change Miti-
        
        
          gation and Forestry Programmes Also Part of Oil-Rich
        
        
          Nation’s Radical Programme’ The Guardian 11 Octo-
        
        
          ber 2012 
        
        
        
          /
        
        
          oct/11/norway-carbon-tax-oil/print>, accessed Octo-
        
        
          ber 2012.
        
        
          Lister, N. M. (2007), ‘Sustainable Large Parks: Ecolog-
        
        
          ical Design or Designer Ecology’. In J. Czerniak and
        
        
          G. Hargreaves (eds.)
        
        
          
            Large Parks
          
        
        
          (New York: Prince-
        
        
          ton Architectural Press), pp. 35–58.
        
        
          Pinson, D. (2004), ‘Urban Planning: An ‘Undisciplined
        
        
          Discipline?’
        
        
          
            Futures
          
        
        
          36/4 (May 2004), pp. 503–513.
        
        
          Scott, J. C. (1998),
        
        
          
            Seeing Like a State: How Certain
          
        
        
          
            Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
          
        
        
          (New Haven: Yale University Press).