Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 22 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

16(21)

4.2

Impact on performance of assessments and

eligibility checks

To understand how the caseworkers' attitudes affect the individuals´

sickness absence, we need to study the initiatives taken by the

caseworkers during the sick leave. As pointed out in Section 2, the most

common initiatives are the 90- and 180-day eligibility checks, and

assessments in the form of Sassam and AM. It is reasonable to assume

that any impact on sickness absence duration would show in the use of one

or more of these initiatives. Since the initiatives taken in a sick spell are a

function of duration, a linear probability model would be less appropriate.

Instead, we estimate a Cox proportional hazards-model where individual

i

:s

probability to be subject to an assessment or an eligibility check at

t

, given

that the sickness episode is still ongoing, is given by

ijt

θ

. Note that

t

is a

continuous time variable here. The following model is estimated:

'

j

i

ij

j

t

ijt

CW Ind

LO

Index

θ

 

 

'

'

'

log

(2)

where

ijt

θ

log

is a function of the baseline hazard

)(

t

and the parameters

in Equation 1. The effect of being subject to Sassam, AM, and the 90- and

180-day eligibility check is estimated separately.

The results in Table 5 correspond rather well with what we would expect in

terms of a cooperative and a non-cooperative role of the caseworker. For

instance, if the caseworker is positive towards the rehabilitation programs,

the hazard rate for a performed AM is increased by almost 20 percent. In

addition, the hazard rate for performing the 90-day eligibility check is

decreased by 8.4 percent. Furthermore, a positive attitude towards the SI

rules increases the hazard rate for performing both Sassam and the 90-day

eligibility check.

Table 5.

Estimates of hazard ratio impact of caseworkers´ attitudes on

performing assessments and eligibility checks in the sick-leave

process

Attitude

Sassam

AM

Check –

90 days

Check –

180 days

Rehabilitation

0.997

(0.078)

1.198**

(0.079)

0.916**

(0.036)

1.038

(0.053)

SI rules

1.179**

(0.078)

1.080

(0.073)

1.129***

(0.034)

1.004

(0.050)

Note:

Results from estimations of a Cox proportional hazards model of the impact of

caseworkers´ attitudes on performing Sassam, AM, and the eligibility checks respectively. The

model controls for information about the individual regarding gender, age, educational level,

foreign birth, working sector, diagnosis, children under 18 (yes/no), quarter of sick-leave start,

SI benefit, previous days of sickness absence, unemployment, disability benefit since 2000, and

local office (LO). The model also controls for information about the caseworker regarding gender,

age, tenure at the SIA, time in the current position, education, and educational level. We used

65,162 observations. Standard errors are in parentheses. */**/*** indicates statistical

significance at 10/5/1-percent level respectively.