Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 34 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

12(34)

4

Why would reforms influence gender

equality in childcare and on the labor

market?

There are a number of potential mechanisms for how the reserved months

may affect gender equality in the home and labor market, and we will

mention some here. As the development of gender equality is not likely

to be the same in all areas, it will be important to be specific about what

dimension of gender equality is measured. For instance, an encouragement

of fathers’ participation in childcare through reforms in parental leave may

lead to increasingly shared childcare but may not lead to effects on other

domestic work or outcomes in the labor market. Also regarding childcare,

we may get different results depending on the measure; parental leave is

something often seen as a preferred activity while temporary parental leave

when the child is sick may be more of a nuisance and an unwelcome

interruption from work. It may more directly be the outcome of negotiation

between the parents. The standard economic theory would indicate that a

father’s quota would decrease the opportunity cost for fathers to be on

leave and put a cap on the length of mother’s leave. This makes

specialization less economically efficient and may thus have long term

effects both on labor market income and continued childcare division. It

may restrict the bargaining power of the often economically stronger father

and tend towards sharing of both labor market work and household work

(Becker 1981; Lundberg and Pollak 1996; see similar arguments for

reforms in parental leave in Germany in Schober 2014). This argument

assumes that fathers prefer to work over parental leave, an assumption

that is questionable. More clearly the reserved month strengthens the

bargaining power of the father who wants to take leave versus the

employer.

In a more sociological perspective gender is constantly re-defined in

interaction with how paid and unpaid work are structured (see review of

sociological and social policy perspectives by Schober 2014). Policies will

affect the idea of preferred behavior (Lewis 2001), and if the policy is

successful it will also change behavior (Pfau-Effinger 2005; Duvander and

Johansson 2010). It may also be that men’s increased household work and

childcare involvement may be caused by increased interest, especially in

childcare (Duvander and Andersson 2006; Almqvist and Duvander 2014).

When the mothers’ expertise at home is not monopolized anymore and the

father–child bonding is increasing, it is likely that fathers re-prioritize

investments in the labor market, and this may lead to decreased earnings

for fathers (Rege and Solli 2013; Tanaka and Waldfogel 2007).

Explanations of women’s potentially improved position in the labor market

as an effect of fathers’ parental leave use will primarily come from shorter

exits and potentially higher investments in the labor market. As fathers

engage in childcare, a part of mothers’ time will be freed and can be used